Log in to use our free company, program and sector update tracker feature.

September 2007 edition

Supersonic business jet designers need to overcome additional challenges

By Jason Matisheck

The design of a supersonic business jet (SBJ) presents several significant challenges over subsonic aircraft design. The optimal configurations for subsonic vs. supersonic flight differ significantly in such basic areas as fineness ratio, aspect ratio, wing thickness and wing sweep. Supersonic aircraft also suffer a significant reduc-tion in lift-to-drag ratio due to the presence of wave drag. In addition, the ideal engine cycle for supersonic cruise is inefficient and noisy at takeoff conditions. Supersonic aircraft also suffer from the environmental and political problem of sonic boom.

Traditional approaches to supersonic design use area rule and significant wing sweep to reduce wave drag. Cranked forward outer wing panels and/or high lift devices are then used to provide acceptable takeoff and low speed performance. This performance, while adequate, is far short of the performance of a similar weight subsonic aircraft. Turbojet or low bypass turbofan engines are used for good supersonic cruise at the expense of high takeoff noise and lower subsonic efficiency. In some cases, variable geometry is used at the expense of structural weight and maintenance complexity. Until recently, sonic boom was simply a given. New techniques for aircraft shaping to reduce sonic boom show promise, but such shaping necessarily increases the cruise drag and results in a heavier aircraft.


Full report (3743 words) is available by subscription:  

Tell a friend/colleague about this story:



 Contact details from our directory:
Pratt & Whitney Large Commercial Engines Turbofan Engines
Aerion Corporation Airframer

Subscribers are able to access the full text of articles on this web site, and in a downloadable PDF newsletter. If you have a subscription already then please log in, otherwise see our latest subscription offers.

Enhanced listings:

General Plastics Manufacturing Co.
General Plastics has been supplying OEMs, Tier 1 and Tier 2 companies with flame-retardant foam core materials and custom flexible foam molded parts for aircraft flight decks and interior cabins for over 50 years.

Quintus Technologies
Quintus Technologies is a global leading provider of high pressure fluid cell presses and hydroform deep-draw presses for sheet metal forming

Victrex Plc
New VICTREX® AE250 composites and hybrid molding technology are changing the equation in Aerospace composites – find out more!

United Performance Metals
A global distributor and processor of titanium products for over 40 years, and a leading supplier to the aerospace industry

Dexmet Corporation
Dexmet MicroGrid® an innovative product line that help improve the composite aircraft withstand the rigors of a lightning strike

See our advertising tariff.


Monthly page limit exceeded. Please buy a subscription.

© Copyright of Airframer Limited, operated under licence by Stansted News Limited 2016. Terms & Conditions of reading.